Twilight

Jul. 23rd, 2010 11:47 pm
This is addressed to everyone who says that the Twilight series is trash, and harmful trash at that.

When was the last time you praised art that was aimed at a majority-female audience? When was the last time you praised art that was by a female creator?

If you are incapable of reasonably judging art that fits these two basic criteria, then please shut up about it.

(Note: you don't have to even personally like it, although if you only like art aimed at men and written by men, that's an issue in and of itself. It is common to praise something without personally liking it much: "My friends who like mysteries all seem to like this book." or "This is a good new intro to the subject [which I have studied for twenty years]." or "I loved the way that movie used color to indicate when people were dreaming." or "That book was what made its genre first popular and introduced a number of its core concepts.")

Bonus points: when was the last time you praised anything that is primarily enjoyed by teenage girls?
James James
Said to his mother,
"Mother", he said, said he,
"You must never go down
To the end of the town
Without consulting me."


My young niece and I have been reading A.A. Milne poems together. By "reading together" I mean that I read and she listens while disassembling the other book with her feet, but that's pretty standard when reading to a small and active child. I've been reading the poems pretty much straight, although I did adjust the line that referred to "a baby of [her age, of which she's very proud, thank you very much]."

Yesterday we read the James James Morrison Morrison poem. I really like that poem, for a number of different reasons, but it does not make my feminist self happy.

I was thinking about it this morning on the way to the bus: Well, it is amazingly patronizing in a gender-based way, but there's also the age difference between the characters. Other poetry in the collection expresses its focus on and sympathy with children by patronizing adults. Milne was writing poetry for a son, so it makes sense that the main characters in his poems would generally be small boys. It's okay. It's not a sexist thing.

And that? Not true. The poem does contribute to an unhealthy view of gender, especially when read to a small, fervently absorbing, child.

That does not make it a bad poem. That does not make it a poem I am unwilling to read to my niece. That does not make it a poem I am unwilling to recite to myself, or joke over with family. The unpleasant gender roles are simply a fact, like the slightly dodgy meter in the middle, or the fact that small American children whose parents drink tea when they are sick have no idea what you mean by "back in time for tea". All of these facts make it a less good poem; none of them are deal-breakers.

It was so tempting, even knowing better as I do, to say that one of these facts was not true and therefore not a problem. It is the far more accurate and courageous thing to say that it is true, and that I can live with that.
I'm up late for tedious (yet predictable) reasons, so this is a burst of insight without sufficient explanation or justification.

Large parts of the Disney version of Mulan are slash, but the viewpoint character (and also the one wearing more clothing) is female.

Obligatory footnote: I know about femslash, but the gloweringly emotional sword fight backstory seems to only be an element of, um, melslash?

Obligatory footnote ^ 2: I think I'd actually really like reading a gloweringly emotional sword fight backstory for femslash, as well as the the ensuing slash.

Obligatory footnote ^ 3: Bits of Strangers in Paradise are about as close as a non-slash-savvy work of art is going to come to the previous footnote. Hmm.

skew

Jun. 24th, 2009 01:33 am
I've come up with a new human-interaction metaphor set, because I needed a word out of it.

Think 3-space. In boring old Euclidean 3-space, lines can be parallel, intersecting, or skew.

Intersecting lines are fights. Some pairs of people are basically in spherical space: any interaction, no matter where it starts, will eventually end in a fight. If you can't keep a relationship from being in spherical space, you might be better off avoiding following any line in it very far. (Shades of "If you can't change your organization, change your organization.")

Parallel or parallelish-and-bouncing-off-each-other (here's where we drop geometrical definitions and go back to generic world-based spatial intuition) lines are good, healthy relationships. You run along the samish way, with your own individual bumps and wiggles, and you periodically interact and influence each other.

Skew lines are those things which you want to describe as fights, even though technically no fighting went on because you were in two different conversations, in two different universes. Treating skews as fights can easily lead to more skews, as one party quite legitimately points out that it wasn't a fight and the other party quite legitimately points out that it sure as hell hurt like a fight and neither point really gets addressed by the other.
I know why I'm not sleeping. I could discourse, at length, on the factors going into my current wakefulness, and the probable weights of each.

What I can't do is affect it.

Glargh.
I've been trying to notice when advertising is trying to sell me something, and what messages it's trying to send. One of the side-effects: my first response to the Barbie pictures I just saw was "What's wrong with her neck?
The doorbell just rang. Two nicely-dressed people, one holding a small nicely-bound book, rang my doorbell on a Saturday afternoon. My immediate assumption was that they were door-to-door religion-sellers.

They were looking for local French speakers. I wish I could have been more help to them than, "Um, maybe the university?", because they were such a pleasant surprise.
I keep putting off making my first entry, out of some notion that I should say something worthy of being the first entry. I hereby stop this.

I have finished the first sock of the yarn that looked humdrum blue in the ball, but is gorgeous blue/blue-gray/blue-green when knit up. (Fortissima Colori 9098) The sock is very well-shaped when I wear it, but has the usual bizarre shaping when it's not on. Also, given that I cast on for the last time (several false starts) on 3/2, it was a fast knit for me. There are many reasons why I would not do well in pre-Industrial times, including my slow handwork.

Profile

malka

June 2014

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011 121314
151617 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags